Skip to main content
Lemma

TMUA practice: Quadratics, problem 3

A TMUA-calibre quadratics problem at difficulty 4 of 5, with the full worked solution.

The question
Consider a quadratic equation   ax2+2bx+c=0\;ax^{2} + 2bx + c = 0, where aa, bb and cc are positive real numbers. If the equation has no real roots, then which of the following is true?
A a,b,c cannot be in AP or HP, but can be in GPa,\, b,\, c \text{ cannot be in AP or HP, but can be in GP}
B a,b,c cannot be in GP or HP, but can be in APa,\, b,\, c \text{ cannot be in GP or HP, but can be in AP}
C a,b,c cannot be in AP or GP, but can be in HPa,\, b,\, c \text{ cannot be in AP or GP, but can be in HP}
D a,b,c cannot be in AP, GP or HPa,\, b,\, c \text{ cannot be in AP, GP or HP}

The correct answer is highlighted. C

Worked solution

The discriminant of   ax2+2bx+c=0  \;ax^{2} + 2bx + c = 0\; is   (2b)24ac=4(b2ac)\;(2b)^{2} - 4ac = 4(b^{2} - ac). ‘No real roots’ means   b2ac<0\;b^{2} - ac < 0, i.e.   b2<ac\;b^{2} < ac (and a,c>0a,\, c > 0 make ac>0ac > 0).

Test each progression.

  • AP.   a,b,c  \;a,\, b,\, c\; in AP means   2b=a+c\;2b = a + c, so   b=(a+c)/2\;b = (a + c)/2. Then   b2=(a+c)2/4\;b^{2} = (a + c)^{2}/4. The condition b2<acb^{2} < ac becomes   (a+c)2<4ac\;(a + c)^{2} < 4ac, i.e.   (ac)2<0\;(a - c)^{2} < 0. Impossible — the LHS is a square. So AP is not possible.
  • GP.   a,b,c  \;a,\, b,\, c\; in GP means   b2=ac  \;b^{2} = ac\; (the standard GP middle-term identity). Then the strict inequality b2<acb^{2} < ac becomes   ac<ac\;ac < ac, impossible. So GP is not possible.
  • HP.   a,b,c  \;a,\, b,\, c\; in HP means   b=2ac/(a+c)  \;b = 2ac/(a + c)\; (the harmonic-mean formula). Then   b2=4a2c2/(a+c)2\;b^{2} = 4 a^{2} c^{2}/(a + c)^{2}. The condition b2<acb^{2} < ac becomes   4a2c2/(a+c)2<ac\;4 a^{2} c^{2}/(a + c)^{2} < ac, i.e. (cancelling ac>0ac > 0)   4ac<(a+c)2\;4 a c < (a + c)^{2}, i.e.   (ac)2>0\;(a - c)^{2} > 0. Possible whenever aca \ne c.

So a,b,ca,\, b,\, c cannot be in AP or GP, but can be in HP (with aca \ne c). This is option C.

Why the other options fail.

  • A is exactly backwards on GP and AP: GP requires b2=acb^{2} = ac, contradicting b2<acb^{2} < ac strictly.
  • B: the AP case forces (ac)2<0(a - c)^{2} < 0, impossible.
  • D: the HP case is consistent (e.g. a=1,c=4a = 1,\, c = 4 in HP gives b=8/5b = 8/5 and b2=64/25=2.56<4=acb^{2} = 64/25 = 2.56 < 4 = ac).

The lesson: AM-GM-HM inequality states AMGMHM\text{AM} \ge \text{GM} \ge \text{HM}. AP/GP/HP impose b=AMb = \text{AM}, b2=GM2=acb^{2} = \text{GM}^{2} = ac, or b=HMb = \text{HM} respectively, which order against the discriminant condition b2<acb^{2} < ac.